Skip to main content
ZICQ

Skills ZICQ category:Agent Workflows automation-audit-ops

Automation Audit Ops

Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.

7432 installs

Official URL:skills.sh

What this skill does

Intro in this page language first. The official description stays in its original wording; we do not rewrite SKILL.md.

What it does

Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC

When to use it

- user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"

How agents load it

Per Agent Skills progressive disclosure: name and description load at startup (~100 tokens); the full SKILL.md body loads when the skill activates; scripts/, references/, and assets/ load only as needed. This file's sections: Automation Audit Ops; Skill Stack; When to Use; Guardrails; Workflow; 1. Inventory the real surface. It includes spec-recommended sections: step-by-step instructions.

File analysis

File analysis: instruction-only skill (SKILL.md). The agent loads the full body when activated.

Automation Audit OpsSkill StackWhen to UseGuardrailsWorkflow1. Inventory the real surface2. Classify each item by live state3. Trace the proof path4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-nextOutput FormatPitfallsVerification

Source category:skills.sh agent-skill

SKILL.md & Agent activation

Official spec ↗
name
automation-audit-ops
description
Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.
  1. DiscoverThe client exposes names and descriptions to the agent.
  2. ActivateYour request or the task context selects the skill and loads its instructions.
  3. Load resourcesReferenced scripts, documentation and assets are used when needed.

Invocation syntax and available tools depend on your Agent client. Client integration guide ↗

Install this skill

Skills CLI ↗

Choose the target agent and installation scope, keep referenced package files, then verify the skill appears in the client's catalog.

Ask your Agent to install

Copy these instructions to a compatible agent and confirm the target directory matches your client.

Install the agent skill "automation-audit-ops" into my project. The full SKILL.md and official description are at https://zicq.com/en/skills/skl-d5f00a726d67ca3e-Automation-Audit-Ops.html
Save it as .cursor/skills/automation-audit-ops/SKILL.md or .claude/skills/automation-audit-ops/SKILL.md and keep the frontmatter name and description exactly as-is.

Full package on GitHub ↗

Install from the terminal · Skills CLI

Requires Node.js and npx. First inspect the repository's skill list to confirm the name.

npx skills add 'https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc' --list

npx skills add 'https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc' --skill 'automation-audit-ops'

The CLI lets you choose the agent interactively. The default scope is the project; use -g for user scope. Confirm package availability with the discovery command, then use npx skills list to inspect installed skills.

Readable layout

name: automation-audit-ops description: Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything. metadata: origin: ECC

Automation Audit Ops

Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.

This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.

Skill Stack

Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:

  • workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventory
  • knowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable context
  • github-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automation
  • ecc-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app repo
  • research-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docs
  • verification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery

When to Use

  • user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"
  • the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations
  • the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside ECC
  • the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane

Guardrails

  • start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes
  • separate:
    • configured
    • authenticated
    • recently verified
    • stale or broken
    • missing entirely
  • do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it
  • do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists

Workflow

1. Inventory the real surface

Read the current live surface before theorizing:

  • repo hooks and local hook scripts
  • GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows
  • MCP configs and enabled servers
  • connector- or app-backed integrations
  • wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints

Group them by surface:

  • local runtime
  • repo CI / automation
  • connected external systems
  • messaging / notifications
  • billing / customer operations
  • research / monitoring

2. Classify each item by live state

For every surfaced automation, mark:

  • configured
  • authenticated
  • recently verified
  • stale or broken
  • missing

Then classify the problem type:

  • active breakage
  • auth outage
  • stale status
  • overlap or redundancy
  • missing capability

3. Trace the proof path

Back every important claim with a concrete source:

  • file path
  • workflow run
  • hook log
  • config entry
  • recent command output
  • exact failure signature

If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.

4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next

For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:

  • keep
  • merge
  • cut
  • fix next

The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical ECC lane, not in preserving every historical path.

Output Format

CURRENT SURFACE
- automation
- source
- live state
- proof

FINDINGS
- active breakage
- overlap
- stale status
- missing capability

RECOMMENDATION
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next

NEXT ECC MOVE
- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen

Pitfalls

  • do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read
  • do not treat "present in config" as "working"
  • do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path
  • do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first

Verification

  • important claims cite a live proof path
  • each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category
  • the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next

Related skills

Agent Workflows

Skill Creator

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that exte…

Agent Workflows

Clawdhub

Use the ClawdHub CLI to search, install, update, and publish agent skills from clawdhub.com. Use when you need to fetch new skills on the fl…

Agent Workflows

Agent Team Orchestration

Orchestrate multi-agent teams with defined roles, task lifecycles, handoff protocols, and review workflows. Use when: (1) Setting up a team …

Agent Workflows

Superpowers

Spec-first, TDD, subagent-driven software development workflow. Use when: (1) building any new feature or app — triggers brainstorm → plan →…