arXiv Research: Deconstructing Structural and Semantic Challenges in LLM Classical Planning

Summary:This research delves into the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in classical planning tasks, distinguishing the impact of structural complexity from semantic interpretability. The study finds that the zero-training delete-relaxation heuristic $h_{\mathrm{add}}$ outperforms other learning-based alternatives in predicting structural difficulty, achieving a mean Spearman correlation of 0.931. Additionally, by progressively renaming predicates while preserving states, transitions, and opti

---

Background and Motivation

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in natural language processing tasks but face challenges in classical planning. Existing benchmarks rarely distinguish between structural complexity and semantic interpretability, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate LLM performance in planning tasks. This study aims to systematically analyze these challenges and propose directions for improvement.

Key Findings

1. Superiority of Structural Difficulty Prediction

   • The zero-training delete-relaxation heuristic $h_{\mathrm{add}}$ outperforms other learning-based alternatives in predicting structural difficulty, achieving a mean Spearman correlation of 0.931. This is significantly better than ridge regression (0.707), object count (0.657), and the episodic retrieval architecture ARC (0.400).

2. Impact of Semantic Changes

   • By progressively renaming predicates while preserving states, transitions, and optimal plans, the study reveals a drop in LLM planning success from 67.5% to 40.0%, highlighting the critical role of semantic understanding.

3. Direction for Improving Hybrid Planning

   • The research indicates that hybrid routing between an LLM and a symbolic planner depends more on calibration to the target LLM's outcomes than on the structural score selected. Therefore, improving hybrid planning requires modeling LLM behavior sensitive to predicate semantics rather than developing more structural predictors.

Technical Mechanism Analysis

• Delete-Relaxation Heuristic $h_{\mathrm{add}}$: This algorithm simplifies planning problems by deleting operations to estimate structural difficulty quickly. Its advantage lies in the ability to predict without solving the instance and its stable cross-domain performance.
• Predicate Renaming Experiment: By keeping states, transitions, and optimal plans unchanged while renaming predicates, the study reveals the impact of semantic changes on LLMs, demonstrating their limitations in handling semantic ambiguity.

Engineering Trade-offs and Performance

• Advantages: The $h_{\mathrm{add}}$ algorithm performs well in predicting structural difficulty and has low computational costs, making it suitable for large-scale planning tasks.
• Disadvantages: The significant impact of semantic changes on LLMs indicates that existing models still have room for improvement in handling complex semantic relationships.
• Performance: The $h_{\mathrm{add}}$ algorithm performs well across multiple STRIPS domains, validating its cross-domain applicability.

Developer Deployment Recommendations

• Application Scenarios: Suitable for scenarios requiring rapid assessment of planning problem difficulty, such as intelligent scheduling, automated planning, and resource allocation.
• Deployment Recommendations: It is recommended to use in combination with symbolic planners to fully leverage the advantages of LLMs in semantic understanding and planning generation.
• Future Directions: Further research on LLM capabilities in handling semantic ambiguity and exploring more effective hybrid planning methods.

---

Source: ArXiv AI (cs.AI) (2026-10-21)

— END —

Tags: #Large Language Models Follow #Classical Planning Follow #Structural Complexity Follow #Semantic Interpretability Follow #Hybrid Planning Follow