ZICQ
中 Log in / Sign up
Newsroom Research & Papers #CiteAnchor #Hallucinated Citations #Source-Aware #ArXiv #NLP

ArXiv Releases CiteAnchor: A Source-Aware Framework for Detecting and Resolving Hallucinated Citations

Avatar of Mr.Xu

By Mr.Xu Compiled & Reviewed by Editorial

Published:

中文阅读 (Chinese) English Version

Summary:ArXiv introduces CiteAnchor, a novel framework for detecting and resolving hallucinated citations. By adapting retrieval and field-level verification to each source type, CiteAnchor enhances the accuracy of citation validation and source recovery. On benchmark tests, CiteAnchor achieves an F1 score of 0.841 with GPT-5.6 Luna and 0.784 with an open-weight backbone, outperforming baselines by 7.9 and 36.8 points, respectively. On the CiteResolve task, it surpasses web search baselines by 16.3% and


Technical Mechanism Analysis

The core innovation of the CiteAnchor framework lies in its source-aware mechanism, which adjusts retrieval strategies and field-level verification methods based on different document types (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, books). Specifically, CiteAnchor implements hallucinated citation detection and resolution through the following steps:

  1. Source-Aware Retrieval: Selects appropriate retrieval strategies based on the document type. For example, it uses specific databases for journal articles and library catalogs for books.
  2. Field-Level Verification: Verifies the retrieved documents at the field level, including author, title, publication year, volume, page numbers, etc., to ensure the accuracy of the citation.
  3. Citation Validity Judgment: Combines retrieval and verification results to determine whether the citation is valid and whether a unique source can be recovered.

Engineering Trade-offs and Performance

CiteAnchor is designed to consider the characteristics of different document types and achieves efficient retrieval and verification through its source-aware mechanism. In benchmark tests, CiteAnchor demonstrates superior performance:

  • Detection Task: CiteAnchor achieves an F1 score of 0.841 with GPT-5.6 Luna as the backbone network, surpassing the baseline by 7.9 percentage points; with an open-weight backbone network, the F1 score is 0.784, surpassing the baseline by 36.8 percentage points.
  • CiteResolve Task: CiteAnchor achieves end-to-end task success rates of 74.7% and 70.7% on the CiteResolve task, outperforming traditional web search baselines by 16.3% and 65.3%, respectively.

These results indicate that CiteAnchor has a significant advantage in handling complex citation validation tasks, especially when dealing with cross-type documents and low-quality documents.

Developer Implementation and Deployment Recommendations

For developers, CiteAnchor provides an effective tool to solve the problem of hallucinated citations in scientific literature. Here are some deployment recommendations:

  1. Integration into Document Management Systems: Integrate CiteAnchor into existing document management systems to automatically detect and resolve hallucinated citations, improving the efficiency and accuracy of document management.
  2. Application in Academic Search Engines: Apply CiteAnchor to academic search engines to help users find relevant documents more accurately and reduce miscitations due to hallucinated citations.
  3. Extension to Other Fields: In addition to scientific literature, CiteAnchor can be extended to other fields, such as legal documents, medical documents, etc., to solve similar problems.

Conclusion

The release of CiteAnchor provides a new technical path for citation validation in scientific literature. Its source-aware mechanism and efficient retrieval and verification methods give it a significant advantage in handling complex citation tasks. In the future, with continuous improvement and optimization, CiteAnchor is expected to be applied in a wider range of fields.


Source: ArXiv NLP/LLM (cs.CL) (2026-10-24)

— END —

Tags: #CiteAnchor #Hallucinated Citations #Source-Aware #ArXiv #NLP

Editorial & Fact-Checking Note: This article is compiled from primary research, official release documentation, and source papers by the ZICQ Newsroom pipeline with automated entity verification and human editorial review. If you notice any technical inaccuracy, please submit a correction via our corrections policy or email our editorial desk directly.

Community Comments

Loading live comments and annotations…