ZICQ
中 Log in / Sign up
Newsroom Agentic #arXiv #Agent Architecture #Data Delivery #Multi-turn Dialogue

arXiv Proposes BYPASS Architecture: Enhancing Data Delivery Correctness in Tool-Using Agents

Avatar of Mr.Xu

By Mr.Xu Compiled & Reviewed by Editorial

Published:

中文阅读 (Chinese) English Version

Summary:arXiv introduces the BYPASS architecture, a novel approach to improve data delivery correctness in multi-turn, tool-using agents. Unlike the traditional SYNTHESIS architecture, BYPASS retains records in session state and translates follow-up queries into arguments for a deterministic filter, delivering data rows through a typed side channel. In tests across 24 dialogues (339 scored turns each), BYPASS achieved a correctness rate of 92.3%, compared to 45.7% for SYNTHESIS. Additionally, BYPASS mai


Technical Mechanism Analysis

The core innovation of the BYPASS architecture lies in its data delivery mechanism. Unlike traditional methods (such as SYNTHESIS) that feed full record sets into the planner's context, BYPASS optimizes the data processing flow through the following approaches:

  1. Session State Retention: BYPASS retains records in the session state rather than re-inputting data in each turn, reducing the risk of errors from repeated data processing.
  2. Deterministic Filter: Follow-up queries are translated into arguments and processed through a deterministic filter. This approach ensures data consistency and accuracy.
  3. Typed Side Channel Delivery: Data rows are delivered through a typed side channel, further reducing the likelihood of data corruption.

Engineering Trade-offs and Performance

The BYPASS architecture excels in several aspects:

  • Correctness: In tests across 24 dialogues, BYPASS achieved a correctness rate of 92.3%, compared to 45.7% for SYNTHESIS.
  • Data Size Adaptability: BYPASS maintains consistent performance with increasing data size, while SYNTHESIS collapses beyond 74 rows.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Beyond 100 rows, almost no SYNTHESIS answer is correct, whereas each correct BYPASS answer costs roughly 1/200 of that of SYNTHESIS.

Developer Implementation and Deployment Recommendations

For developers, the BYPASS architecture offers a more reliable and efficient method for data delivery, especially in handling complex tasks and multi-turn dialogues. Here are some recommendations:

  1. Prioritize BYPASS Architecture: When designing multi-turn dialogue systems, prioritize the adoption of the BYPASS architecture to enhance data delivery correctness.
  2. Optimize Session State Management: Ensure that the session state management mechanism can effectively retain and update records to support the efficient operation of BYPASS.
  3. Combine with Deterministic Filters: Use deterministic filters to process follow-up queries to ensure data consistency and accuracy.

Conclusion

The BYPASS architecture, with its innovative data delivery mechanism, significantly improves the data delivery correctness of tool-using agents. Its superior performance in correctness, data size adaptability, and cost-effectiveness makes it an ideal choice for multi-turn dialogue system design.


Source: ArXiv NLP/LLM (cs.CL) (2026-11-03)

— END —

Tags: #arXiv #Agent Architecture #Data Delivery #Multi-turn Dialogue

Editorial & Fact-Checking Note: This article is compiled from primary research, official release documentation, and source papers by the ZICQ Newsroom pipeline with automated entity verification and human editorial review. If you notice any technical inaccuracy, please submit a correction via our corrections policy or email our editorial desk directly.

Community Comments

Loading live comments and annotations…