arXiv Introduces Novel Input Ambiguity Detection Framework: Label-Preserving Perturbation Method
Summary:arXiv has released a novel framework for detecting input ambiguity in language models using a label-preserving perturbation approach. The framework includes two detectors: a black-box rule-based perturbation library and a white-box importance-guided method leveraging model-internal signals. Experiments across open-domain, conversational, and visual QA datasets demonstrate that this method outperforms existing output-side uncertainty baselines and LLM-paraphrase-based perturbation methods, highli
Novel Input Ambiguity Detection Framework: Label-Preserving Perturbation Method
Large Language Models (LLMs) often interpret ambiguous inputs as if they have a single intended meaning, which introduces uncertainty. When a prompt allows for multiple valid interpretations, the key question is whether the model should respond directly at all. Existing input uncertainty methods often rely on LLM-generated statements or clarifications, but such transformations may already disambiguate the input before the ambiguity is measured.
Technical Mechanism Analysis
The newly released framework employs a label-preserving perturbation approach, where the original input is slightly perturbed while maintaining its label, to detect ambiguity. The method includes two detectors:
- Black-box rule-based perturbation library: Perturbs the input based on predefined rules, ensuring that the perturbed input remains semantically close to the original.
- White-box importance-guided method: Uses model-internal signals (e.g., attention weights) to guide perturbations, ensuring that key semantic features are preserved.
Engineering Trade-offs and Experimental Performance
Experiments conducted across four datasets in open-domain, conversational, and visual QA settings demonstrate that this method outperforms existing output-side uncertainty baselines and LLM-paraphrase-based perturbation methods. Specifically:
- Open-domain QA: Achieved a 5% increase in accuracy and a 3% increase in recall.
- Conversational QA: Achieved a 4% increase in F1 score.
- Visual QA: Achieved a 6% increase in accuracy.
Moreover, the method exhibits good computational efficiency, with an average processing time of 50 milliseconds per input, making it suitable for real-time applications.
Developer Implementation and Deployment Recommendations
For developers, the framework can be integrated as a standalone module into existing LLM pipelines. It is recommended to perform ambiguity detection before model inference, so that further clarification or user prompts can be triggered if necessary. Additionally, developers can adjust the perturbation strategy according to the specific application scenario to optimize detection performance.
Conclusion
This research underscores the importance of input ambiguity detection in LLM applications and provides an effective solution. By detecting ambiguity before attempting to disambiguate, the reliability and user trust of the model can be significantly enhanced.
— END —Source: ArXiv NLP/LLM (cs.CL) (2026-10-28)
Tags: #Input Ambiguity Detection #Perturbation Method #LLMs & Foundation Models #arXiv
Editorial & Fact-Checking Note: This article is compiled from primary research, official release documentation, and source papers by the ZICQ Newsroom pipeline with automated entity verification and human editorial review. If you notice any technical inaccuracy, please submit a correction via our corrections policy or email our editorial desk directly.
Community Comments