arXiv Proposes Compiler-Guided Repair for Enhanced Lean 4 Theorem Proving Efficiency
Summary:arXiv introduces a novel approach for automated theorem proving that leverages a bounded, online step-level repair module. By sampling candidate tactics and repairing failed steps using a pretrained repair model based on compiler error messages, this method achieves up to a 32% relative improvement in solve rate on the LeanDojo benchmark, solving 82 additional theorems compared to sampling-only baselines. The approach demonstrates efficiency and effectiveness in enhancing theorem-proving capabil
Background and Motivation
In the field of automated theorem proving, traditional sampling-based methods rely on language models to generate candidate tactics. However, these methods discard error messages when a proof step fails, leading to inefficiency. Proof assistants like Lean 4 provide precise error messages, but these are not fully utilized. To address this, researchers propose a compiler-guided repair approach that enhances proving efficiency by repairing failed steps.
Technical Mechanism
The core of this approach is an online, bounded repair module. At each step, the search process samples $K$ candidate tactics ($K \in {1,3,5,8}$) and attempts to repair failed tactics up to $R$ times using a pretrained repair model. The repair model leverages compiler error messages to identify and fix errors, rather than discarding failed tactics outright.
Trade-offs and Performance
- Performance Improvement: Compared to the sampling-only baseline, this method achieves up to a 32% relative improvement in solve rate on the LeanDojo benchmark, solving 82 additional theorems.
- Computational Overhead: The repair process is not free; it trades extra runtime for higher solve rates. However, the overhead is manageable, especially when sampling is constrained, and the return on repair is most significant in such cases.
- Gain Distribution: The majority of the gain (84%-96%) is captured by the first repair attempt. Additionally, the gains come primarily from shallow tactic-execution failures rather than structural errors like type mismatches.
Developer Takeaways and Deployment
- Use Cases: This method is suitable for complex reasoning tasks that require high solve rates, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
- Optimization Tips: Developers can adjust the values of $K$ and $R$ based on the specific task to balance solve rate and computational overhead.
- Future Directions: Future research could explore integrating the repair model with more sophisticated reasoning strategies to further enhance solve rates and efficiency.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the significant potential of compiler-guided repair in improving the efficiency of automated theorem proving, providing new insights for the design of future reasoning systems.
— END —Source: ArXiv AI (cs.AI) (2026-10-21)
Tags: #Lean 4 #Theorem Proving #Compiler-Guided #Repair Model #Automated Reasoning
Editorial & Fact-Checking Note: This article is compiled from primary research, official release documentation, and source papers by the ZICQ Newsroom pipeline with automated entity verification and human editorial review. If you notice any technical inaccuracy, please submit a correction via our corrections policy or email our editorial desk directly.
Community Comments