arXiv Introduces Explainable Header-Centric Framework for Semantic Table Interpretation and Data Quality Assessment

Summary:arXiv introduces a novel explainable, header-centric framework for metadata-only Semantic Table Interpretation (STI) and Data Quality Assessment (DQA). The framework maps headers to 39 interpretable FinalFormat types using curated lexical resources and preserves token-level traceability through SourceKeywords. It activates validation rules based on a taxonomy of Data Quality Issues (DQIs) to detect issues such as missing data, duplicates, domain violations, wrong data types, and temporal mismatc

---

1. Background and Motivation

In the construction of Knowledge Graphs (KGs), data quality is crucial. However, in many cases, tabular metadata such as column headers are the only available source of semantic information. Traditional Semantic Table Interpretation (STI) and Data Quality Assessment (DQA) methods rely on cell values, but when these values are unavailable, noisy, or unsuitable, headers become a critical source of semantic evidence.

2. Key Innovations

• Explainable Header-Centric Framework: The framework maps headers to 39 interpretable FinalFormat types and preserves token-level traceability through SourceKeywords, ensuring transparency and accuracy in semantic interpretation.
• Data Quality Issues (DQI) Taxonomy: Based on the DQI taxonomy, the framework activates validation rules to detect issues such as missing data, duplicates, domain violations, wrong data types, and temporal mismatches.
• HeadersIQ Metric: The detection results are aggregated into HeadersIQ, a lightweight, unweighted data source-level quality metric, providing a quantitative basis for data quality assessment.

3. Experiments and Results

The framework was evaluated across multiple benchmarks, including UCI, Prague, Kaggle, VizNet/Sato, SOTAB, T2Dv2, and the SemTab 2024 Metadata-to-KG track, covering approximately 120,000 header columns. The results demonstrate the framework's broad practical coverage in handling noisy real-world metadata. Additionally, the framework supports alignment with knowledge graphs like DBpedia and Schema.org.

4. Industry Impact and Future Directions

This research provides a reusable workflow for metadata-driven semantic annotation, data source-level quality monitoring, and KG-oriented benchmark diagnosis. It has significant implications for knowledge graph construction, data management, and AI-driven data analysis. Developers can leverage this framework to improve the efficiency and accuracy of data quality assessment, thereby optimizing the performance of downstream AI models.

5. Developer Recommendations

• Integration: Developers are advised to integrate the framework into existing data processing pipelines to enhance the efficiency of data quality assessment.
• Custom Extensions: Depending on specific application scenarios, developers can extend the FinalFormat types and DQI taxonomy to meet particular needs.
• Multimodal Data Processing: Future work could explore applying the framework to multimodal data processing, further broadening its applicability.

---

Source: ArXiv AI (cs.AI) (2026-10-10)

— END —

Tags: #Semantic Table Interpretation Follow #Data Quality Assessment Follow #Knowledge Graph Follow #Metadata Follow #AI Framework Follow