arXiv Introduces Framework for Automated Construction of Hierarchical Hardware Knowledge Graphs
Summary:arXiv introduces an automated LLM-driven framework that transforms hardware datasheets into hierarchical hardware knowledge graphs. The framework utilizes chunk-based property extraction, hierarchical routing, and iterative refinement to achieve 98.8% property faithfulness across 20 diverse hardware datasheets, outperforming the one-shot baseline by 22.7%. This approach enhances the reliability and comprehensiveness of engineering data for tasks such as component selection, system integration, a
Background and Challenges
Hardware datasheets are essential resources in engineering design, containing critical specifications for component selection, system integration, and hardware compatibility verification. However, manual processing of these datasheets is time-consuming and error-prone, as the information is often fragmented across tables, figures, and text. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate this process, traditional one-shot processing methods tend to miss key information when dealing with lengthy documents.
Technical Solution
This paper presents an automated LLM-driven framework that transforms hardware datasheets into hierarchical hardware knowledge graphs through the following steps:
- Chunk-based Property Extraction: The framework divides the datasheet into multiple chunks and uses LLMs to extract properties and relationships from each chunk.
- Hierarchical Routing: A hierarchical routing mechanism organizes the extracted properties into a tree-like structure to better represent the hierarchical relationships of the data.
- Iterative Refinement: An iterative refinement process continuously improves the structure and content of the knowledge graph to ensure completeness and accuracy.
The framework preserves data provenance during information extraction and semantic reasoning and updates the knowledge graph through validated instructions and deterministic local execution. This staged design reduces the context for each query while maintaining traceable intermediate representations.
Experiments and Results
The research team tested the framework on 20 hardware datasheets of various types, covering different document lengths and component types. Evaluation metrics included property faithfulness and inter-graph completeness to measure semantic coverage without relying on exhaustive ground truth. The results showed that the framework achieved 98.8% property faithfulness, compared to 76.1% for the one-shot baseline. In terms of inter-graph completeness, the framework fully covered 83.6% of the baseline properties, while the baseline only covered 10.5% of the framework's properties.
Engineering Trade-offs and Practical Applications
The framework's strengths lie in its high fidelity and broad semantic coverage, significantly reducing the risk of information omission in engineering design. However, its main challenge is the reliance on LLMs and the computational overhead of processing very long documents. To address this, the framework employs chunk-based processing and hierarchical routing mechanisms to balance computational efficiency and accuracy.
For developers, the framework can be integrated into existing engineering design workflows for automated datasheet processing and knowledge graph construction. It is recommended to fine-tune the framework with domain knowledge to further improve processing accuracy. Additionally, due to the computational cost of LLMs, it is advisable to use the framework in resource-abundant environments.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates the great potential of LLMs in engineering data processing, providing an efficient and scalable solution for hardware knowledge graph construction. Future research directions include further optimizing the framework's hierarchical routing mechanism and exploring more efficient LLM fine-tuning methods.
— END —Source: ArXiv AI (cs.AI) (2026-10-12)
Tags: #Large Language Model #Knowledge Graph #Hardware Data Processing #LLMs & Foundation Models #Automated Framework
Editorial & Fact-Checking Note: This article is compiled from primary research, official release documentation, and source papers by the ZICQ Newsroom pipeline with automated entity verification and human editorial review. If you notice any technical inaccuracy, please submit a correction via our corrections policy or email our editorial desk directly.
Community Comments